Skip to main content
    StealthNet AI
    Platform Comparison

    AI Penetration Testing Platforms Compared

    Compare StealthNet, XBOW, Terra Security, Aikido, and Keygraph across real-world exploitation, compliance reporting, speed, pricing, and security outcomes.

    View Pricing Options

    Same-week scoping•Compliance-ready reports•48-hour AI pentests

    The category, framed

    AI security is splitting into two markets

    Buyers should know which group a platform belongs to before comparing features. The two groups solve different problems and produce different deliverables.

    AppSec and developer security platforms

    Help engineering teams find and fix issues across code, dependencies, and cloud workflows. The deliverable is a continuous AppSec posture, not a pentest report.

    Often evaluated: Aikido, Keygraph.

    StealthNet sits here

    Offensive security and pentesting platforms

    Simulate real attackers and validate exploitability against deployed systems. The deliverable is an exploit-validated, compliance-ready penetration test report.

    Often evaluated: StealthNet, XBOW, Terra Security.

    Comparison matrix

    Side-by-side platform comparison

    StealthNet, XBOW, Terra Security, Aikido, and Keygraph across the dimensions security and compliance leaders evaluate.

    StealthNet

    Recommended
    Primary Category
    AI-powered penetration testing
    Best Fit
    Teams needing real-world validation and compliance deliverables
    Pentesting Depth
    High
    Compliance Reporting
    Strong, audit-ready
    Pricing Clarity
    Clear one-off and annual pricing
    Human Validation
    AI plus senior tester options
    StealthNet Takeaway
    Built for pentest outcomes

    XBOW

    Primary Category
    Autonomous offensive security
    Best Fit
    Technical teams exploring autonomous exploitation
    Pentesting Depth
    High technical depth
    Compliance Reporting
    Less standardized
    Pricing Clarity
    Less transparent publicly
    Human Validation
    Primarily autonomous
    StealthNet Takeaway
    Strong on autonomous exploitation

    Terra Security

    Primary Category
    Agentic pentesting with human oversight
    Best Fit
    Enterprise teams evaluating AI plus human workflows
    Pentesting Depth
    Moderate to high
    Compliance Reporting
    Available, scope dependent
    Pricing Clarity
    Likely custom scoped
    Human Validation
    Yes, agentic plus human
    StealthNet Takeaway
    Enterprise agentic workflows

    Aikido

    Primary Category
    Developer-first AppSec platform
    Best Fit
    Engineering teams managing AppSec workflows
    Pentesting Depth
    Lower for external pentesting
    Compliance Reporting
    Not focused on pentest deliverables
    Pricing Clarity
    Subscription-based AppSec
    Human Validation
    Limited
    StealthNet Takeaway
    AppSec, not pentesting

    Keygraph

    Primary Category
    AppSec and AI security platform
    Best Fit
    Teams focused on source-code-driven security
    Pentesting Depth
    Lower for external pentesting
    Compliance Reporting
    Not focused on pentest deliverables
    Pricing Clarity
    Less transparent
    Human Validation
    Limited
    StealthNet Takeaway
    Code security, not pentest outcomes
    Pricing snapshot

    Transparent StealthNet pricing

    Other vendors typically scope custom pricing. StealthNet publishes clear starting points so teams can plan.

    One-Off Testing

    Annual Packages

    Starter Compliance
    from
    $10,000/ year
    • 1 Hybrid Pentest per year
    • 1 AI validation scan per month
    • Compliance-ready reporting
    • Free retesting
    • Standard support
    Most Popular
    Growth Plan
    from
    $14,000/ year
    • 1 Hybrid Pentest per year
    • 2 AI validation scans per month
    • Compliance-ready reporting
    • Free retesting
    • Slack channel and priority support
    • Continuous validation layer
    Security Maturity
    from
    $25,000/ year
    • 2 Hybrid Pentests per year
    • 4 AI validation scans per month
    • Compliance-ready reporting
    • Free retesting
    • Priority testing queue
    • Advanced support tier

    Final pricing depends on scope, environment complexity, and testing requirements.

    Deep-dive comparisons

    Compare StealthNet against each platform

    Autonomous Offensive Security

    StealthNet vs XBOW

    Compare StealthNet vs XBOW for autonomous AI pentesting.

    Compare now
    Agentic AI Plus Human Pentesting

    StealthNet vs Terra Security

    Compare StealthNet vs Terra Security for AI plus human pentesting.

    Compare now
    Developer-First AppSec

    StealthNet vs Aikido

    Compare StealthNet vs Aikido for AppSec vs real-world pentesting.

    Compare now
    AppSec Automation

    StealthNet vs Keygraph

    Compare StealthNet vs Keygraph for code security vs pentesting outcomes.

    Compare now
    FAQ

    Frequently asked questions

    An AI penetration testing platform uses autonomous agents to simulate attacker behavior across web apps, APIs, networks, and identity surfaces. Unlike vulnerability scanners, the goal is to validate what an attacker can actually exploit, not just list potential weaknesses.

    Get Started

    See StealthNet in Action Live

    Request a personalized demo and get scope, approach, and pricing guidance for your environment in one call.

    48-Hour Reports
    70%+ Cost Savings
    Compliance Ready

    No credit card. No obligation. Same-week scoping for most environments.